We know that people have trouble evaluating risks. (To be more precise, people have trouble with conditional probability) One way this manifests itself is in society’s preoccupation with dramatic but minor threats (like terrorism) while less dramatic (or more abstract), but much more serious threats are ignored. Here are eight bona fide existential threats to humanity, that is, things that could make humans extinct, or at least eradicate any semblance of modern society.
8. Rapid Extinction of Critical Species
Our food supply is composed of various interconnected plant and animal species. We sometimes forget just how interconnected they are. For instance, the entire oceanic ecosystem depends on phytoplankton (little floating plants). If phytoplankton were to rapidly die off, due to changing water temperature, acidity or perhaps a virulent disease, the entire oceanic ecosystem would collapse. Bye bye fish, sharks, whales, krill, crabs, lobster… everything. Our agriculture is also fundamentally dependent on a small number of key species: worms (which aerate the soil) and bees (which pollinate practically everything). If worms or bees were to suddenly die off, horrendous famine and mass extinction would follow.
7. Environmental Collapse
The theory of environmental collapse is based on the idea that most organisms are tightly interconnected. Thus ecosystems are web-like structures where each species depends, directly or indirectly, on many other species. Many scientists believe that there is a kind of diversity threshold such that, if we lose enough species, entire ecosystems will collapse. Given the alarming rate at which species are becoming extinct (somewhere in the order of 100 to 1000 times faster than normal), if such a threshold exists, we may be getting close.
This, of course, would not only cause horrifying environmental destruction for which our grandchildren would never forgive us, and eradicate all sorts of potential medicines, but also produce global famine.
6. Human Disease
The Black Plague killed half the population of Europe in the 14th century, when slow methods of travel (horses and tall ships) impeded its spread. A similar disease today could rapidly spread across six continents. It is possible that the right (wrong?) disease could kill practically everyone on the planet. This could be a natural occurrence or a biological weapon.
As a society, however, we like to flip out about every new strain of the flu and take dramatic, but entirely ineffective, steps to assuage public fear. We close schools and hassle airline passengers. What we don’t do is create a culture where it is unacceptable to go to work, go shopping, take public transit, or generally wander around coughing on people when you have a contagious infection. Meanwhile, we let sick people sit around cross-infecting each other in waiting rooms for hours because we don’t have enough doctors on staff. And more fundamentally, we don’t address the continual degradation of human immune systems due to nutritionally devoid diets and epidemics of obesity, diabetes and respiratory disease.
5. Climate Change
If you still think climate change is a hoax, get help. No scientific conjecture has received more thorough testing and analysis in history than man-made climate change. If the temperature continues to rise, three important things will happen:
-
sea level will rise
-
deserts will grow
-
storms will become more extreme
All of these have severe effects on the food supply. As sea levels rise, farmland close to sea level will be flooded. As deserts grow, they consume previously arable land. As storms grow more extreme, more food and farmland will be destroyed each year. You might think that as the temperature warms, we’ll be able to farm further north, and that will make up for the farmland lost to sea level rise and desertification. You would be wrong. The arctic is already a cold desert. Climate change will likely just make it a less-cold desert.
4. Nuclear War
Any open conflict between two nuclear powers, be they the US and Russia, India and Pakistan or China and North Korea, has the potential to end life as we know it. Even if initial blast only kill millions, the radioactive fallout from a large-scale nuclear conflict could poison not only billions of people but also our food and water supplies.
3. Supervulcanism
Sorry Trekkies, Supervulcanism is not about controlling emotions and mind melds. It refers to a sudden rise in global volcanic activity. Volcanos are like the Earth’s smokestacks. If they all start spewing out ash at once, the atmosphere would become opaque, blocking out the suns rays. Imagine a thousands years of twilight. Now imagine 99% of the worlds plants dying, shortly followed by 100% of the world’s animals, including us.
Supervulcanism contributed to at least three Mass Extinctions.
2. Supernova or Gamma Ray Burst
When two stars collide or a large star goes supernova (collapses into a black hole), it can create an extremely energetic explosion. This energy travels outward in the form of Gamma Rays, which are sort of like X-rays on steroids. If such an energetic explosion occurred somewhere ‘nearby’ earth, say anywhere in our galaxy, the resulting gamma ray burst could destroy the ozone layer and irradiate the earth’s surface. It would be sort of like Marvin the Martian finally getting his giant ray gun to work and frying Earth with it.
Everything dies but the cockroaches.
1. Astronomical Impact
There are a lot of big rocks floating around in space. Every once in a while, two of them come together. Whether it’s an asteroid or a commet or even something from outside our solar system, if any big chunk of space debris come crashing into Earth, we’re dead.
Strong evidence supports an impact causing the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction event (the one that killed the dinosaurs). How did it happen? Well, when a 10km-wide rock slam into the ground, several things happen. First, there’s the initial explosion – several orders of magnitude more powerful than the nukes dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Depending where the impact occurs, that could kill millions, or just a whole lot of fish. Then there’s the earthquake. We’re talking a 16 on the Richter Scale – 100 000 time more powerful than any earthquake in human history. The ground would move in waves, tossing people and building about like boats on a seething ocean. It would decimate buildings and infrastructure all over the world. Imagine the aftermath of the worst earthquake ever, and all the hospitals have been destroyed.
Assuming you survive all of that, you’ll have the pleasure to freeze and/or starve to death when all the dust thrown into the atmosphere blocks out the sun, just as in supervulcanism.
Only the cockroaches survive.
| Comments | Published in | PREV | NEXT |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 |
social issues environment list war |
Yeah if yellowstone went off we would be dead in a heartbeat. Right now i believe yes climate change is happening but not to the ridiculous extent its being portrayed. We our shaping the climate a bit yes, but there is such a thing as more sunspots then normal and anomaly’s in weather patterns for a few years. I think all the doomsday scenarios are a bit far fetched
@Brian,
the most recent studies of climate change I’m aware of, the evidence is pointing firmly at the worst case scenario (see http://www.news10.net/news/green/story.aspx?storyid=59921&catid=62 for summary). Do you have any evidence that the touted scenarios are exaggerated, or are you simply unwilling to face the possibility of impending disaster? (I think I’ll have to write a post about climate change soon).
Im not saying i don’t believe in climate change but that the worst case scenarios seems to be a fit far fetched. Here is a list of scientists who agree: http://www.cato.org/special/climatechange/ClimateAd_ChicagoTrib_Rev.pdf.
In al gore’s movie An inconvenient truth there was a scenario put forth that the sea levels would rise 20 ft if Greenland which has 10% of the worlds ice would loose it in a rapid ice loss. The IPCC (intergovernmental panel on climate change) which got a nobel prize with gore in 07 projected the sea level to rise 9 – 19 inches and cited that the estimate does not assume rapid ice loss because there was no scientific support for that analysis. since then several scientific papers have been published saying rapid ice loss is unlikely. On a sort of unrelated matter congress is to incompetent to even be able to make good policy to combat global warming anyways. I mean they can barley run the damn post office. We also have no money, and printing more money is never a good idea. My question would be: Is there a suite of technologies that can dramatically cut emissions by say like 2040 or 2050?(NO) It would be futile to spend money on such technologies with money that could be spent on the future of the united states or what ever country you are in.
Fuck the borders and the economic sanctions imposed upon any nation.
The world needs to grow.
Democracy is a failed system.
Accept reality.
Logic. Rational behavior.
Confidence and discretion.
Discipline Respect.
Music, global domination.
Honor Loyalty.
>>>
Positive Momentum
@Brian, the answer to your question “Is there a suite of technologies that can dramatically cut emissions by say like 2040 or 2050?” is most certainly ‘yes.’ Unfortunately, there is not enough political will to enact the necessary changes. I recommend Thomas Friedman’s book “Hot, Flat and Crowded” for a good discussion of the subject. Perhaps a list of carbon-reduction technologies would make a good blog post…
@Badden, going for poetic? One of the realities we must accept is that people are neither logical nor rational…
[...] I described eight possible events that would likely destroy civilization as we know it. These include diseases, climate change and [...]
Actually it will be the Fungi that will survive in the end..