<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intelligent design not very intelligent</title>
	<link>http://thewaronbullshit.com/2008/05/08/intelligent-design-not-very-intelligent/</link>
	<description>Take No Prisoners</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 19:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Riley Firth</title>
		<link>http://thewaronbullshit.com/2008/05/08/intelligent-design-not-very-intelligent/#comment-1896</link>
		<author>Riley Firth</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thewaronbullshit.com/2008/05/08/intelligent-design-not-very-intelligent/#comment-1896</guid>
		<description>@Dave
While you make an interesting point, I would reply that I am not concerned as much with Ben Stein's documentary as the unsupported belief if supports. My problem is with Intelligent Design as a scientific theory more-so than with whatever support Stein dredges up for the 'theory.'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dave<br />
While you make an interesting point, I would reply that I am not concerned as much with Ben Stein&#8217;s documentary as the unsupported belief if supports. My problem is with Intelligent Design as a scientific theory more-so than with whatever support Stein dredges up for the &#8216;theory.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zander</title>
		<link>http://thewaronbullshit.com/2008/05/08/intelligent-design-not-very-intelligent/#comment-1888</link>
		<author>Zander</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 02:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thewaronbullshit.com/2008/05/08/intelligent-design-not-very-intelligent/#comment-1888</guid>
		<description>While we do understand that Intelligent design cannot be proven scientifically, and is therefore impossible. I believe the real question is why do people still desire to cling to the idea that their is a creator who can completely ignore the  known laws of physics to create us. 

Personally the real BS is how people in power use these beliefs to persuade others to doing what they want them to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we do understand that Intelligent design cannot be proven scientifically, and is therefore impossible. I believe the real question is why do people still desire to cling to the idea that their is a creator who can completely ignore the  known laws of physics to create us. </p>
<p>Personally the real BS is how people in power use these beliefs to persuade others to doing what they want them to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://thewaronbullshit.com/2008/05/08/intelligent-design-not-very-intelligent/#comment-1886</link>
		<author>Dave</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thewaronbullshit.com/2008/05/08/intelligent-design-not-very-intelligent/#comment-1886</guid>
		<description>That's exactly my point. He's utilizing the same practice that he is critizing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s exactly my point. He&#8217;s utilizing the same practice that he is critizing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H</title>
		<link>http://thewaronbullshit.com/2008/05/08/intelligent-design-not-very-intelligent/#comment-1790</link>
		<author>H</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 21:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thewaronbullshit.com/2008/05/08/intelligent-design-not-very-intelligent/#comment-1790</guid>
		<description>"You have not utilized any scientific basis for your statements. "

Just like the boneheads that believe in this bullshit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You have not utilized any scientific basis for your statements. &#8221;</p>
<p>Just like the boneheads that believe in this bullshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://thewaronbullshit.com/2008/05/08/intelligent-design-not-very-intelligent/#comment-1767</link>
		<author>Dave</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 16:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thewaronbullshit.com/2008/05/08/intelligent-design-not-very-intelligent/#comment-1767</guid>
		<description>If he wants to be taken seriously, yes he does need something else. It's interesting that you seem to support science in the area of intelligent design but do not require the same standards to be set upon reviewing something (regardless of how absurd) challenging the mainstream scientific community. I'm not insinuating that Ben is correct. I'm simply stating that until you've seen the movie. You have not utilized any scientific basis for your statements. This is exactly the opposite practice of the point you are trying to make in regards to intelligent design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If he wants to be taken seriously, yes he does need something else. It&#8217;s interesting that you seem to support science in the area of intelligent design but do not require the same standards to be set upon reviewing something (regardless of how absurd) challenging the mainstream scientific community. I&#8217;m not insinuating that Ben is correct. I&#8217;m simply stating that until you&#8217;ve seen the movie. You have not utilized any scientific basis for your statements. This is exactly the opposite practice of the point you are trying to make in regards to intelligent design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
