<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bring me Hookers and Blow! A Novel Solution to the Drug Problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thewaronbullshit.com/2007/11/18/drugproblem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thewaronbullshit.com/2007/11/18/drugproblem/</link>
	<description>Take no prisoners</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 18:23:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://thewaronbullshit.com/2007/11/18/drugproblem/comment-page-1/#comment-496</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 01:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewaronbullshit.com/2007/11/18/drugproblem/#comment-496</guid>
		<description>Great post, thanks for the info... last part makes the most sense though</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, thanks for the info&#8230; last part makes the most sense though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The War On Bullshit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Judgment-impairing drugs</title>
		<link>http://thewaronbullshit.com/2007/11/18/drugproblem/comment-page-1/#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>The War On Bullshit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Judgment-impairing drugs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 16:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewaronbullshit.com/2007/11/18/drugproblem/#comment-495</guid>
		<description>[...] post continues the series on solving the drug problem, which begins here. The most recent segment differentiated between drug uses that affect surrounding people, such as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post continues the series on solving the drug problem, which begins here. The most recent segment differentiated between drug uses that affect surrounding people, such as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The War On Bullshit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Solving the Drug Problem: Private, Public and Business Usage.</title>
		<link>http://thewaronbullshit.com/2007/11/18/drugproblem/comment-page-1/#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator>The War On Bullshit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Solving the Drug Problem: Private, Public and Business Usage.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 19:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewaronbullshit.com/2007/11/18/drugproblem/#comment-494</guid>
		<description>[...] the first post in this series, I discussed the essence of the drug problem, and determined that the real problem [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the first post in this series, I discussed the essence of the drug problem, and determined that the real problem [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blair T. Longley</title>
		<link>http://thewaronbullshit.com/2007/11/18/drugproblem/comment-page-1/#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>Blair T. Longley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 00:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewaronbullshit.com/2007/11/18/drugproblem/#comment-493</guid>
		<description>Hello, I am the leader of the

Canadian Marijuana Party ...

I will comment on your part I.

Of course I agree with your view that

... &quot;prohibition does not stop drug use but
it does provide the impetus and financial basis
for organized crime.&quot;

I think that prohibition is intended to do that.

I also agree with your critique of Libertarianism.

People need information to make good choices.

I agree with your view of current education:

&quot;{drug education&#039; is a euphemism for an
incompetent, politicized, horribly biased,
farcical attempt at brainwashing our children.&quot;

Again, I think that is deliberately being done.

The rest of your post indicates
how much you must hate pot.

I point out that there is no necessary connection
between marijuana and SMOKING marijuana ...

Smoking is the worst way to consume cannabis.

The idea that people should SMOKE marijuana
is one of the side-effects of pot&#039;s prohibition.

Good vaporizer machines
are many times better ...

Eating cannabis cooking is good.

Also, there are the facts that
marijuana seeds provide the
single best source of food as
protein and oil, for humans,

and the fact that marijuana stalks
are a high quality fiber, as well as
a good source of annual biomass.

That marijuana is fun is actually
less important overall than the
facts that is would be a good
source of food and fiber too.

That marijuana is also good medicine
for some people is also significant too.

As for the Marijuana Party &quot;whining&quot;
about jurisdiction, I do think that is
a fair way to describe the real facts.

IF marijuana was not a Federal crime in Canada,
then it would automatically come under control
by provinces, and under that, municipalities ...

That is the way the Canadian constitution IS.

The Federal Marijuana Party does not need
any policy about what provinces should do.

As the article you links to explains,
IF marijuana was not illegal, then,
the only thing the Federal power
could do is spend money within
the provincial and municipal
schemes to subsidize pot.

Now, for the bigger picture.

Your entire Web site is about

The War on Bullshit ...

I think you should wade through
a lot more my blah, blah, blah,
about that in posting on our
forum, &amp; party leader part
of our current Web site:

www.marijuanaparty.ca

I think you shall find a much deeper
understanding of the war on bullhsit,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, I am the leader of the</p>
<p>Canadian Marijuana Party &#8230;</p>
<p>I will comment on your part I.</p>
<p>Of course I agree with your view that</p>
<p>&#8230; &#8220;prohibition does not stop drug use but<br />
it does provide the impetus and financial basis<br />
for organized crime.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think that prohibition is intended to do that.</p>
<p>I also agree with your critique of Libertarianism.</p>
<p>People need information to make good choices.</p>
<p>I agree with your view of current education:</p>
<p>&#8220;{drug education&#8217; is a euphemism for an<br />
incompetent, politicized, horribly biased,<br />
farcical attempt at brainwashing our children.&#8221;</p>
<p>Again, I think that is deliberately being done.</p>
<p>The rest of your post indicates<br />
how much you must hate pot.</p>
<p>I point out that there is no necessary connection<br />
between marijuana and SMOKING marijuana &#8230;</p>
<p>Smoking is the worst way to consume cannabis.</p>
<p>The idea that people should SMOKE marijuana<br />
is one of the side-effects of pot&#8217;s prohibition.</p>
<p>Good vaporizer machines<br />
are many times better &#8230;</p>
<p>Eating cannabis cooking is good.</p>
<p>Also, there are the facts that<br />
marijuana seeds provide the<br />
single best source of food as<br />
protein and oil, for humans,</p>
<p>and the fact that marijuana stalks<br />
are a high quality fiber, as well as<br />
a good source of annual biomass.</p>
<p>That marijuana is fun is actually<br />
less important overall than the<br />
facts that is would be a good<br />
source of food and fiber too.</p>
<p>That marijuana is also good medicine<br />
for some people is also significant too.</p>
<p>As for the Marijuana Party &#8220;whining&#8221;<br />
about jurisdiction, I do think that is<br />
a fair way to describe the real facts.</p>
<p>IF marijuana was not a Federal crime in Canada,<br />
then it would automatically come under control<br />
by provinces, and under that, municipalities &#8230;</p>
<p>That is the way the Canadian constitution IS.</p>
<p>The Federal Marijuana Party does not need<br />
any policy about what provinces should do.</p>
<p>As the article you links to explains,<br />
IF marijuana was not illegal, then,<br />
the only thing the Federal power<br />
could do is spend money within<br />
the provincial and municipal<br />
schemes to subsidize pot.</p>
<p>Now, for the bigger picture.</p>
<p>Your entire Web site is about</p>
<p>The War on Bullshit &#8230;</p>
<p>I think you should wade through<br />
a lot more my blah, blah, blah,<br />
about that in posting on our<br />
forum, &amp; party leader part<br />
of our current Web site:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.marijuanaparty.ca" rel="nofollow">http://www.marijuanaparty.ca</a></p>
<p>I think you shall find a much deeper<br />
understanding of the war on bullhsit,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The War On Bullshit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Novel Solution to the Drug Problem - part 2</title>
		<link>http://thewaronbullshit.com/2007/11/18/drugproblem/comment-page-1/#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator>The War On Bullshit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Novel Solution to the Drug Problem - part 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 04:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewaronbullshit.com/2007/11/18/drugproblem/#comment-492</guid>
		<description>[...] The War On Bullshit Take No Prisoners       &#171; Bring me Hookers and Blow! A Novel Solution to the Drug Problem [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The War On Bullshit Take No Prisoners       &laquo; Bring me Hookers and Blow! A Novel Solution to the Drug Problem [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H</title>
		<link>http://thewaronbullshit.com/2007/11/18/drugproblem/comment-page-1/#comment-491</link>
		<dc:creator>H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 19:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewaronbullshit.com/2007/11/18/drugproblem/#comment-491</guid>
		<description>If you say it then it MUST be true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you say it then it MUST be true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kavan Wolfe</title>
		<link>http://thewaronbullshit.com/2007/11/18/drugproblem/comment-page-1/#comment-490</link>
		<dc:creator>Kavan Wolfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 18:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewaronbullshit.com/2007/11/18/drugproblem/#comment-490</guid>
		<description>clearly you Ron Paul fanboys didn&#039;t read this post: http://thewaronbullshit.com/2007/09/14/ronpaul/

And as to this &quot;anyone who is against Ron Paul is against freedom and the constitution,&quot; this is the kind of critical-thinking killing bullshit that has gotten the US into it&#039;s current boondoggle.  If you&#039;d try to think for yourself you might be able to help your country out of this mess before the American Imperial Empire goes the some way as the Roman Empire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>clearly you Ron Paul fanboys didn&#8217;t read this post: <a href="http://thewaronbullshit.com/2007/09/14/ronpaul/" rel="nofollow">http://thewaronbullshit.com/2007/09/14/ronpaul/</a></p>
<p>And as to this &#8220;anyone who is against Ron Paul is against freedom and the constitution,&#8221; this is the kind of critical-thinking killing bullshit that has gotten the US into it&#8217;s current boondoggle.  If you&#8217;d try to think for yourself you might be able to help your country out of this mess before the American Imperial Empire goes the some way as the Roman Empire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Frederick Voorhees</title>
		<link>http://thewaronbullshit.com/2007/11/18/drugproblem/comment-page-1/#comment-489</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Frederick Voorhees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewaronbullshit.com/2007/11/18/drugproblem/#comment-489</guid>
		<description>Hi H-

Let&#039;s not overestimate how much thought goes into comments like Jeremy&#039;s.  Puking up the &quot;protection from oneself&quot; litany is a lot like putting a patriotic bumper sticker on your car.  Do we really care about &quot;protecting&quot; drug users or &quot;supporting&quot; our troops?

Or do we simply want to give the appearance that we care, while excusing ourselves from actually doing so?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi H-</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s not overestimate how much thought goes into comments like Jeremy&#8217;s.  Puking up the &#8220;protection from oneself&#8221; litany is a lot like putting a patriotic bumper sticker on your car.  Do we really care about &#8220;protecting&#8221; drug users or &#8220;supporting&#8221; our troops?</p>
<p>Or do we simply want to give the appearance that we care, while excusing ourselves from actually doing so?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H</title>
		<link>http://thewaronbullshit.com/2007/11/18/drugproblem/comment-page-1/#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewaronbullshit.com/2007/11/18/drugproblem/#comment-488</guid>
		<description>and so what if he is a Ron Paul supporter? To put it bluntly, anyone who is against Ron Paul is against freedom and the constitution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and so what if he is a Ron Paul supporter? To put it bluntly, anyone who is against Ron Paul is against freedom and the constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H</title>
		<link>http://thewaronbullshit.com/2007/11/18/drugproblem/comment-page-1/#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator>H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewaronbullshit.com/2007/11/18/drugproblem/#comment-487</guid>
		<description>Jeremy wants a nanny state. Ever heard of the concept of self-responsibility?

There are lots of things that someone can harm themselves doing. Not just drugs. If every activity that could potentially cause harm to the one doing it (with that&#039;s one&#039;s consent and knowledge of the risks) we would have a very boring, police state world.

Bringing harm or threatening harm to OTHERS or others property is all the government has any right to intervene on. Anything else is bullshit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy wants a nanny state. Ever heard of the concept of self-responsibility?</p>
<p>There are lots of things that someone can harm themselves doing. Not just drugs. If every activity that could potentially cause harm to the one doing it (with that&#8217;s one&#8217;s consent and knowledge of the risks) we would have a very boring, police state world.</p>
<p>Bringing harm or threatening harm to OTHERS or others property is all the government has any right to intervene on. Anything else is bullshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

